http://tinyurl.com/7qgt4
(This is being said by Peter Lance)
I believe Dietrich Snell should answer publicly:
a) Why the last official body looking into the biggest mass murder in U.S. history left out probative evidence of an al Qaeda connection to the second biggest: TWA #800.
b) Why the DOJ initially kept the hunt for Khalid Shaikh Mohammed so secret and
c) Why they buried evidence that the 9/11 plot was created by Ramzi Yousef (the original WTC bomber) and his uncle as early as the fall of 1994.
What surprised you the most about the experience? What was the most frustrating aspect of the experience?
The frustrating part was sitting across from Dieter Snell who wouldnt answer why he and his partner limited the scope of the Bojinka trial and never called Col. Mendoza.
In the end, the Commission reduced my findings to an end note and, still never mentioned Colonel Mendozas name. Why?
The DOJ/FBI cover up in the late summer of 1996 also explains why lead intelligence officials apparently blew an opportunity to pursue the evidence of Col. Mendoza from the Philippines in 1995.
By 1996 it was in the interest of senior DOJ and FBI officials to minimize the importance of Ramzi Yousef as the architect of the 9/11 plot. First, they had him incarcerated and possessed enough evidence to put him away for 240 years. But more importantly, they didn't want the full story to come out about how the FBI could have stopped Yousef in the fall of 1992 prior to his first date with the Trade Center.