Posted on 08/11/2005 1:40:02 PM PDT by epluribus_2
bump
Michael Savage was talking about it yesterday, though.
Nah. He's teflon. And people don't care, imo.
The question was, why didn't the Justice Dept. and the FBI make his name public immediately in 1995 when they received evidence from Col. Mendoza that KSM had conspired with his nephew Ramzi to hijack airliners and fly them into buildings? Why seal the indictment and why not make KSM the subject of the same kind of public international dragnet that captured Yousef?
"The Feds made a big deal out of grabbing the overweight, bug eyed KSM in March of 2003 in Pakistan, but by my reckoning they had blown at least two chances to grab him earlier before all those people died on 9/11 -- once in 1995 the day Yousef was caught and later in 1996 when the Feds learned KSM was in Doha, Qatar, and cooled their heels waiting while a Qatari official spirited him out of the country to the Czech Republic."
From: http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=16795
I haven't e-mailed it to anyone; we're getting a thunderstorm here and I have got to turn off this computer. bbl
Bump to read later.
This is Buckhead stuff.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18219-2005Mar8.html
This is an interesting article about Snell too.
Yep. These are the best kinds of threads. FReepers do the work that the MSM can't or won't.
I just emailed a link to this thread to Rush's 24/7 Subscriber email addy.
Is this one of the two people who could say what the commission saw?
Who was posting on the Jamie Gorelick thread today that she was one of the two who decided what data the commission saw?
Old Friend heard a family member who was well aware of how the Commission operate call into a radio station today.
That person said that Gorelick and one other person who Old Friend didn't recognize were in charge of looking at all information that came in.
Did you see the part where Snell was offered to plea deal with the jihadist who said a 9/11 style day was planned and Snell didn't take the deal?
Check out this thread! And Google Dietrich Snell, this is incredible..... It's not Dan Blather and it's not Joe Wilson -- this time it's a lib MOLE in a critical position on the 9/11 Commission staff. I'm just starting to read up on this but it seems huge and outrageous: Dietrich Snell, who was up to his ears in key terror prosecution work in the mid-90s, may have played a key role in seeing that the 9/11 Commission did not look hard at who knew what when during the 1990s. It's looking like our federal gov't had lots of relevant names and info to break up Al Qaeda cells and prevent 9/11, if only people like Jamie Gorelick and Dietrich Snell had put the info into the right hands instead of walling it off in obscurity!
We need to keep all these articles about Snell. Thanks for that!
Do you mean this???
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461258/posts?page=98#98
To: XJarhead
I heard a caller to WABC radio this morning. The John Gambling Show.
She was from a family group and sounded as tho she was quite familiar with the Commission and the process.
She stated that the information came into the committee thru Gorelick and one other and it was they who decided what information was forwarded to other members.
98 posted on 08/11/2005 1:27:55 PM EDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
Storm seems to have passed so I'm still here :-)
bttt
Looks as though Gorelick and Snell are in some DEEP doo doo
Somebody ought to send this info to the Jersey Girls. They used to have a web sight. They were media darlings during the election. With info like this they might feel a bit used. Nothing is worse than the wrath of scorned woman. As much as I hate to see Kristin Breitweiser on tv she might just be the one to give this things legs.
stay dry index
bump for later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.