Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pikamax
It did not make it into the final report because the information was not consistent with what the commission knew about Atta's whereabouts before the attacks, Felzenberg said.

So they had a pre-determined outcome and Able Danger information didn't fit how they wanted the report to read.

And another freeper heard a radio call today. It was a 9/11 family member who said that Gorelick and another Commission staffer controlled all the information that got presented to the full Commission. For Gorelick, it's all about damage control and protecting the Clinton legacy. And that's what Sandy Berger's stuffing documents into his pants was all about too.

24 posted on 08/11/2005 1:01:16 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Peach

In a "real' world, Gorelick should be face down with a boot on the back of her neck and a dozen weapons drawn on her skanky, liberal ..........you know what....


33 posted on 08/11/2005 1:09:01 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Peach

"For Gorelick, it's all about damage control and protecting the Clinton legacy. And that's what Sandy Berger's stuffing documents into his pants was all about too."

I agree with you completely on both points.


40 posted on 08/11/2005 1:17:40 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Peach

Get a load of this.

Dietrich Snell is one of the guys approached by Able Danger operatives.

Author Peter Lance later calls Snell “one of the fixers, hired early on to sanitize the Commission's final report.” Lance says Snell ignored evidence presented to the Commission that shows direct ties between the Bojinka plot and 9/11, and in so doing covers up Snell's own role in the failure to make more use of evidence learned from Murad and other Bojinka plotters. [FrontPage Magazine, 1/27/05]


50 posted on 08/11/2005 1:52:59 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Peach

From the first reports I read, they first noticed him in 1999, is that right?

That would have put the blame right on Clinton; as it is, with the late 2000 date, they can claim they passed it to Bush and he did nothing, right?


64 posted on 08/11/2005 3:01:39 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson