Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dolphan
private property owners should be allowed to restrict/admit whoever they please onto all or any of their property.

Thank you Mr Crow.

45 posted on 08/11/2005 12:51:48 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy

"Thank you Mr Crow."

Jeez, grow up, Mr. PC police. Race is not what he was talking about and you know it. Nobody here is saying the property manager was even remotely right in what he did. We are discussing private ownership of property and yes, people should be allowed to direct the use of their property as they see fit and be prepared to deal with the consequences.


51 posted on 08/11/2005 12:56:03 PM PDT by L98Fiero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
private property owners should be allowed to restrict/admit whoever they please onto all or any of their property.

Thank you Mr Crow.

Not that I agree at all with what is done, but you distort what Jim Crow laws were: A GOVERNMENT ban on private businesses conducting free trade. It was not private businesses doing it on their own. It is an important distinction, and one which we all suffer for when that distinction is blurred.

244 posted on 08/12/2005 12:34:51 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson