I've been looking into media reports of what Sandy was alleged to have Burgled.
The
Washington Post and
New York Times reported in March and April that the five classified documents were different versions of Richard Clarke's classified millennium "after action review" from EARLY 2000. He also took the handwritten notes he made in the national archive about the after action review. Berger shred three of the five versions because they were allegedly identical. Berger returned the two remaining stolen copies of the report and his handwritten notes after he was called out for stealing the documents by archives staff.
The NYT obtained this information from a Berger "associate" when his plea bargain was announced; the Washington Post's source is less clear, although they also spoke to a "Berger associate who declined to be identified by name but was speaking with Berger's permission."
The Able Danger team put together the al-Qaeda org chart and was prohibited by the Clintonista lawyers from divulging Mohammad Atta's cell to the FBI in SUMMER 2000. So if (and it's a big if) you believe the MSM reports, Sandy wasn't burgling the chart or Atta information.
He could have been burgling other information about Able Danger, though. The project began in 1999 and ended in February 2001. They likely
delivered their final report on which al-Qaeda cells to take out in January 2001, while Clinton was still in office.
Hey, that was good research and all very interesting. I find it hard to believe that the Clintonistas wanted Clarke's after action review. Clarke is an idiot and his comments are worthless. However, the big push was on to not have Clinton blamed for 9/11. The Able Danger team had the proof that it was during the Clinton term when first told about a possible attack. And the AD team just happened not to be called? Please! More Clinton/Gore-lick dirty tricks in my opinion.