[gov_bean_ counter]

Clinton and Co. have always said terrorism is a "law enforcement issue". If that is the case, why wasn't this task force working out of DOJ? In short, why did Clinton and CJCS Shelton think it was a good idea to use the military to spy on Americans. (IMHO, they swerved into Atta). Why even bother is the info wasn't going to be allowed to be shared? There are lots of questions that stem out of this endeavor.

[Enterprise]

Fantastic point there! If terrorism was a "law enforcement" issue, then why wasn't information about terrorists being passed on to "law enforcement?" (I know the answer too, but your point beautifully illustrates the hypocricy of the Clinton Administration.)

[CyberAnt]

But .. according to Weldon - the staff of the 9/11 commission was informed twice about this information - and the fact that the FBI would not accept it.

So .. I suspect Sandy Burgler was destroying the memos regarding Atta - which would have been dynamite. I still think this has now become public because of the Berger conviction. And .. I suspect it's what Sandy told the prosecutors about the stuff he destroyed. The clue to me is that if Atta's name appeared on any of those documents, it was going to be an obvious arrow pointing directly at the Clinton admin. - Berger had to take the risk of trying to steal the information.