[Lando Lincoln]

Lando

[hermgem]

What a Clinton Master Stroke to place Gorelick on the 9/11 commission and thereby not only preclude her from testifying but also stay totally informed of any commission proceedings, including a possibility to report back and immediately report back to her former masters.
Whose influence or pull placed Gorelick on this commission?
To call her in now and testify under oath before a Federal Jury is a minimum to uncover grand negligence or purposeful cover up to obfuscate.
Such is owed to 3000 victims and their families as well as history.
Am worm is out of the can. Endless speculations from here on in will saddle history if known intelligence was surpressed by the commission and/or staffers if left unanswered.

[Southack]

"Could 9/11 Have Been Prevented? The Gorelick Memo and What We Knew"

Keep in mind that our intel agencies also knew that: 9/11/01 hi-jackers' rented car with ID of Saudi pilot who crashed his plane into another in mid-air one year earlier on 9/11/2000

So the Clinton Administration was warned of Atta and his cell by Able Danger in 1999, again in 2000, and then watched one of the 9/11 cell commit a mid-air crash on 9/11/2000.

Where were the arrests?! Where was the investigation?!

[Chi-townChief]

The Reuters link is dead already.

[mercy]

Obviously the fix was in on the 9/11 commission from the get go. DC is one stagnant pool of corruption.

[Eighth Square]

PING

[Homer1]

I think it's worth noting that the Gorelick memo came out less than 3 weeks after the Oklahoma City bombing.

[timestax]

bttt

[jaydubya2]

"Here is what Richard A. Clark, former counter-terrorism advisor for both the Clinton and Bush Administrations, testified to in prepared remarks before the Sept. 11 Commission on March 24, 2004: “In retrospect, we know that there was information available to some in the FBI and CIA that al Qida [sic] operatives had entered the United States."

It's a minor note, but does anyone else find it disturbing that Clarke could not spell the terror group's name correctly?