[LibLieSlayer]

You need to step beyond how you "feel" about this woman and her plight, as horrid and sad as it is. You must educate yourself on who and what she is aligned with. The people that are her handlers work every waking moment for the destruction of our great Nation.

I see nothing in her demeanor that would lead me to believe that she is incoherent as to her actions. She is aware that her words have consequences, and she is so sure of her righteousness that she will ignore the truth for the "greater good".

I am not attacking you; I just want to point out that you are uninformed as to who and what this woman really is, and that she is DEAD wrong... and a TRAITOR!

If you call me a McCarthy-ite, I will be forced to call you a dim. Fair enough?

LLS

[Bellflower]

then they are, in effect, McCarthite.....

If you call me a McCarthy-ite, I will be forced to call you a dim. Fair enough?........

Wasn't McCarthy proved to be more right than wrong. Didn't the Russians unclassified secret documents years later that showed that he had been right about much of what he said?

[Bellflower]

then they are, in effect, McCarthite.....

If you call me a McCarthy-ite, I will be forced to call you a dim. Fair enough?........

Wasn't McCarthy proved to be more right than wrong. Didn't the Russians unclassified secret documents years later that showed that he had been right about much of what he said?

[Friend of thunder]

I am not attacking you; I just want to point out that you are uninformed as to who and what this woman really is, and that she is DEAD wrong... and a TRAITOR!

As I said in my post, she is wrong. Being used by despicable – or even traitorous – people – is not, in itself, traitorous. Traitor strongly implies treason. Treason is, I believe, the only crime defined by the Constitution; it is a very serious charge – as is traitor. My point is that, without considerable evidence, the charge should be made; it cheapens the word.

If you call me a McCarthy-ite, I will be forced to call you a dim. Fair enough?

Fair enough.

If you have evidence that she is more than a useful idiot, I will consider it. I have not paid a lot of attention to the situation because I think it is mainly an indication of the medias bias toward Bush. I just do not like to see very serious accusations thrown around without supporting evidence.

BTW, I do appreciate the polite, reasoned, response.