You won't believe it, but I mentioned the exact same events yesterday about why Clinton didn't want intel agencies talking with each other.
Then someone gave me a FrontPage magazine article about Gorelick covering for Clinton with the wall to protect him from prosecution re the sale of technology to China and accepting Chinese $$ for his campaign.
And I've reda The Third Terrrorist and tout the book all the time. The research is so good that James Woosely endorses her and her work.
IMO, we're never going to get Clinton et al exposed for what they are. They're slick and most people just don't care.
Even today, Clinton is a huge draw wherever he goes. People love him, despite knowing more about his illegal activities since he left office.
IMO, we're never going to get Clinton et al exposed for what they are.
It took over 40 years to prove that there were at least two shooters in Dallas. It will take more than 10 years to prove OKC was a Middle Eastern operation, even though Jayna Davis has already completed that mission. What it will take is US putting pressure on the News Media to do their job, and that is to put pressure on the politicians instead of covering for them.
You have the impression that Clinton is loved. True, there are sheeple who do out of absolute ignorence. But if the truth had been printed about his covering for the terrorists by the government's actions, which was essentially no action, then the masses would at least be throwing eggs at the idiot.
Rush Limbaugh (as I was hitting golf balls in the midday sun today) was talking about the 9/11 story being buried in the news media.
WHY? Because it's not bad news about Bush, it's bad news about Clinton.
David Schippers, who has teamed up with Jayna Davis, has said Clinton may be a bad guy, but he's THEIR bad guy, and they are going to cover for him.
We've got to put a stop to it. I've seen a tread here about the NYSLIMES stock price/circulation going down. It's just a start.
I don't get my news from the main stream press anymore and I know several others who don't listen to "them" either. I prefer reading the comments AFTER glancing at the story on the internet. We are smarter than they are (with unfortunately many exceptions :-)
FOX this morning had two 9/11 surviving family members on and they wanted to know what was going on with the 9/11 commission. They sounded just like us on FREEREPUBLIC.
We need to keep the pressure on!
And I believe you mentioned the same thing I did. Rush knows the possibilities and he was saying today "make your own conclusions on WHAT the agenda of the 9/11 commission was." He's too afraid to talk about the obvious.
Who will be the first to mention the emperor ain't got no clothes on?