Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patriciaruth

You're right that Rudy is pro-choice, and you're right that he has a failed marriage. But patriciaruth, I hope TO GOD you're wrong that he's a non-starter in Republican Presidential politics.

He believes in God and he believes in our country - and he WILL NOT be pushed around on the world or national stage. He can beat Hillary easily - so if the alternative is another Clinton presidency, Rudy's my guy.

And Rudy's not a poll-watcher, either. I remember when he first became Mayor of New York, one of his first actions was to REFUSE to meet with the Reverend Al and his posse after a supposed "racial incident" at a mosque, because, obviously, they had absolutely no standing - and he wasn't afraid to say so. It was then that I knew we had a man of character, who would stick to his guns in the face of the hysterical liberal media.

Of course, you could argue that my priorities reflect my background, and I would accept that, but I am so afraid of this party splitting over this issue....

Can you name me a viable candidate in the "George W. Bush" mold? Not with the name-recognition and credentials of Rudy, I'm afraid. I think, IMHO, that it takes a Rudy to beat a Hillary.


32 posted on 08/11/2005 4:55:40 AM PDT by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: StatenIsland

Can he win the primaries if the pro-life and family values half of the party vote for someone else?

Can he win the general election if the pro-life and family values half of the party stays home?

I am asking this seriously, not rhetorically.


34 posted on 08/11/2005 5:01:21 AM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: StatenIsland
You're right that Rudy is pro-choice, and you're right that he has a failed marriage. But patriciaruth, I hope TO GOD you're wrong that he's a non-starter in Republican Presidential politics.

If Rudi convincingly moderated his positions on abortion and pro-life, he might stand a chance at the nomination.

36 posted on 08/11/2005 5:03:45 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: StatenIsland
"You're right that Rudy is pro-choice, and you're right that he has a failed marriage. But patriciaruth, I hope TO GOD you're wrong that he's a non-starter in Republican Presidential politics. "

Rudy may lose 2-5% of the far right vote because of this, but he will pick up huge numbers in the center and slightly left. He has a lot of respect from moderate democrats who have seen what he did with NYC, choosing between him and Hillary I think he will pull a lot of them with him from the left, far more than we will lose from the right.

38 posted on 08/11/2005 5:07:08 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: StatenIsland

Not marriage, but MARRIAGES. Rudy is now on wife #3.


65 posted on 08/11/2005 6:34:00 AM PDT by JoJo48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: StatenIsland
Can you name me a viable candidate in the "George W. Bush" mold?

1. Cheney

2. Allen

3. ugh

4. ugh

67 posted on 08/11/2005 6:40:16 AM PDT by leadhead (It’s a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson