Skip to comments.
The New GOP Betrays America
Newsmax ^
| Thursday, Aug. 11, 2005
| Diane Alden
Posted on 08/10/2005 8:43:22 PM PDT by Psion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 541 next last
To: The_Eaglet
Eaglet that was an excellent post......!
Thanks
321
posted on
08/11/2005 4:30:59 PM PDT
by
JuneNY
To: Founding Father
Why don't you take this paranoic bilge over to whatreallyhappened.com where they worry about stuff like this.
OOH! Bilderberg. OOH! Masons. OOH! Trilateral Commission, OOH! New World Order.
Oh yeah, OOH! Illuminati.
322
posted on
08/11/2005 4:34:18 PM PDT
by
WillMalven
(It don't matter where you are when "the bomb" goes off, as long as you can say "What was that?")
To: Bushbacker
"Conservatism is not libertarianism"
Thank-you!!!! There seems to be a large faction around here that believe they are the same.
323
posted on
08/11/2005 4:36:34 PM PDT
by
WillMalven
(It don't matter where you are when "the bomb" goes off, as long as you can say "What was that?")
To: trubluolyguy
Where would their agenda be if Kerry was elected and was appointing Ginsburgs to the court?
Can you say "cutting off your nose to spite your face?"
324
posted on
08/11/2005 4:38:20 PM PDT
by
WillMalven
(It don't matter where you are when "the bomb" goes off, as long as you can say "What was that?")
To: WillMalven
"Where would their agenda be if Kerry was elected and was appointing Ginsburgs to the court?"
Would not be a problem if the RINO's would not approve them. The democrats had ho problem Borking Bork, and Nixon's nominees, but the RINO's approved the ACLU's chief counsel. Perhaps we need to get neuticles for all the RINO's:
http://www.neuticles.com/index1.html
325
posted on
08/11/2005 4:47:27 PM PDT
by
fallujah-nuker
(Atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant)
To: WillMalven
"Where would their agenda be if Kerry had been elected?"
At least with Kerry you know what you are getting, we don't expect to elect Repubs and get milquetoast mods.
326
posted on
08/11/2005 4:55:34 PM PDT
by
trubluolyguy
(If you think that's tough, try losing a testicle in a knife fight with your mother!)
To: Sun
I'm afraid that even many Republicans, in higher places, favor one world order. Golly, yuh think?
327
posted on
08/11/2005 5:43:42 PM PDT
by
iconoclast
(Wastin' away again in hearts-and-minds'ville.)
To: jveritas
Uh!!! Another idiot from the very tiny and very bitter fringe of the Conservative movement writes a very long and a very meaningless article attacking the Republican party and President Bush. You'll be smirking out of the other side of your face when that "very tiny" fringe takes a walk on you in '06 and '08.
And you may just soil your knickers when you see see the net your left with.
328
posted on
08/11/2005 5:54:40 PM PDT
by
iconoclast
(Wastin' away again in hearts-and-minds'ville.)
To: hedgetrimmer
If anyone opposes your view they're in bed with a Communist who opposes it for entirely different reasons? What a ridiculous inference
Yep, nothing's new. And since the OBL gang has supported things which Democrats have also supported, it follows that they must be Democrats, or at the least secret admirers . Move along, nothing to see here.
Freshen your vodka, Komrad? Da?
329
posted on
08/11/2005 6:24:20 PM PDT
by
Das Outsider
(Islam is a religion of peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.)
To: skeeter
BTW would Teddy think its OK to measure someone's Americanism by their perspective on the burning issues of the day? Don't know. However, Teddy Roosevelt also said: Every reform movement has a lunatic fringe. Theodore Roosevelt (1913)
Our conservative movement is no different. There is no doubt that Diane Alden is a member of the lunatic fringe as are the various third-party patsy types who frequent these threads.
330
posted on
08/11/2005 6:37:41 PM PDT
by
Mase
To: The Foolkiller
As I read the first 6 pages I thought *How did this woman read my mind?* This has been my thinking for some time now and I am glad that someone had the b*lls to finally say it out loud. Only the blind cannot see that the country is on a downhill slide to destruction or at the very least a position in the world as third rate country will no will to resist.
I realize it will do little good but I am sending a copy of this to my representative, who voted for CAFTA and will probably vote for FTAA. Because it is a long article (he, like all politicians) has a very short attention span and will probably consign it to the round file rather than read it.
331
posted on
08/11/2005 6:49:21 PM PDT
by
JoeBob
(If you live like sheep the wolves will eat you.)
To: Mase
I remember Ronald Reagan being of the "lunatic fringe" for opposing detente favored by the establishment GOP. James A. Baker III stated "Governor Reagan could not start a nuclear war, President Reagan can." Fortunately the voters rejected the lunatic fringe candidate and detente lead to peaceful coexistence with the USSR. Oops, wait, the voters, they elected the "lunatic fringe" candidate, but he started a nuclear war. Oops, no, the RINO's convinced him to sell out the people who voted for him and adopt detente, and there was peace with the Soviet Union. Oh wait, he ignored the GOP establishment, rearmed America and the USSR went into the ash bin of history.
Ronald Wilson Reagan, 1911-2004, lunatic fringe, requiescit in pace.
332
posted on
08/11/2005 7:00:21 PM PDT
by
fallujah-nuker
(Atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant)
To: fallujah-nuker
"If there was a passenger train that carried cars I might find it useful."
Amtrak has an Autotrain that runs from Washington D.C. suburbs down to the Orlando FL area non-stop. It leaves at ~4pm and gets there in the morning sometime.
I've never ridden on it.
333
posted on
08/11/2005 7:32:20 PM PDT
by
indthkr
To: fallujah-nuker
I remember Ronald Reagan being of the "lunatic fringe" for opposing detente favored by the establishment GOP He may have been called lunatic fringe by those who feared his candidacy but he most certainly was not a member of the lunatic fringe. The fringe would never get elected governor of California or win the republican primary in 1980. Despite the RINO's, Reagan had enough support among the party to win the primary and become president.
This is a big difference from Pat Buchanan who couldn't get more than 0.005% of the vote in 2000 and wouldn't do any better now.
334
posted on
08/11/2005 7:32:47 PM PDT
by
Mase
To: Mase
"This is a big difference from Pat Buchanan who couldn't get more than 0.005% of the vote in 2000 and wouldn't do any better now."
Yeah, he's been too thouroughly demonized by the liberal press and the neo-conservative GOP elite who sensed a threat and decided he needed to be crushed hard and early. They succeeded quite well.
335
posted on
08/11/2005 7:38:31 PM PDT
by
neutronsgalore
(Free Trade = Economic Treason)
To: neutronsgalore
the neo-conservative GOP elite who sensed a threat and decided he needed to be crushed hard and early. They succeeded quite well Naw...I think the public is just smarter than you give them credit for. If Pat had a message that resonated, he would've received a lot more votes.
336
posted on
08/11/2005 7:48:49 PM PDT
by
Mase
To: Bushbacker
"Which ineffectual losing party do you vote for now?" I vote for individuals, not a political party.
I support principled candidates who pledge to reduce the size of the federal government.
If that happens to be a Republican, then I will vote for him or her.
But I will no longer donate my hard earned money to an "ineffectual party" that after over 5 years of control has still done NOTHING to end the progressive federal income tax system, or curb the growth of the Federal government bureaucracy, among other things.
You are free to do otherwise, if you so choose.
337
posted on
08/11/2005 7:49:48 PM PDT
by
FBD
("...the border is a dangerous place..."~DHS Sec. Michael Chertoff House Testimony)
To: Czar
Really adds to the dignity, prestige and intellectual prowess of the quislings, doesn't he/she/it?I prefer to believe he/she/it doesn't really believe any of the nonsense he/she/it spouts. He/she/it just has a very odd sense of humor.
338
posted on
08/11/2005 7:53:42 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: Mase
"Naw...I think the public is just smarter than you give them credit for. If Pat had a message that resonated, he would've received a lot more votes."
Naw...I think they played the "if you vote for him, you'll split the vote and the Dems will win" card real well as one of their tactics. A lot of people go by the "Anything is better than a Democrat" philosophy and so they'd rather just keep electing moderates and Rockefeller liberal Repubs pretending to be conservatives rather than true conservatives.
339
posted on
08/11/2005 7:55:29 PM PDT
by
neutronsgalore
(Free Trade = Economic Treason)
To: Psion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 541 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson