And they do look accurate. They even have a little drop in the deficit right where we are now. Did you notice that? No, of course not, you would rather apply the fallacious "guilt by association" argument. Not surprising.
Accurate in that the projection for 2005 is about $100B off? If I'm reading it correctly, it shows about $450B pm the chart. Yep, nats a** accurate.
If no one is able to get even the quarterly GDP numbers correct on a regular basis, how are projections to 2010 even worth putting out?