Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
It's the direction that counts.


37 posted on 08/10/2005 11:31:50 AM PDT by Huck (Whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

Of your politics, you mean?


45 posted on 08/10/2005 11:36:21 AM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
Well, I'll be dipped!!! You ARE a "centrist!" You posted a chart from "Centrist.org" that includes the non-existant "surplus" from the Clinton years, based on the "irrational exuberance" Greenspan spotted clear back in 1996!!!

By the way, we're NOT headed toward any more of a cliff than we were under Carter and we pulled that iron out of the fire in fine shape!!! Get a grip, will ya??? You're addicted to negativity!!!

58 posted on 08/10/2005 11:45:11 AM PDT by SierraWasp (Iraq! Our exit strategy is... VICTORY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Huck
It's the direction that counts.

Just out of curiosity, given that last month's deficit was $6 billion below CBO projects, upon what projection(s) is your chart based? The most current? Given that it appears to be 18 months old, I'd tend to doubt its accuracy (not that projections should ever be presumed to be "accurate")
69 posted on 08/10/2005 11:49:56 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

Post the most recent remarkable reduction.


75 posted on 08/10/2005 11:53:07 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

And by the way, there were NOT these size surpluses in 1999-2000, so I suspect this is not in real dollars.


77 posted on 08/10/2005 11:53:57 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

"Through the first 10 months of the government's fiscal year, the federal deficit totals $302.6 billion, $93.7 billion less than at this time in 2004. Read the full report.

For all of 2005, the CBO expects a deficit of less than $350 billion, with the agency scheduled to make public an updated forecast Monday. The White House forecast a deficit of $333 billion. The deficit totaled a record $412.8 billion in 2004"

Your chart is a projection..obviously the deficit is lower than projected?


175 posted on 08/10/2005 1:52:43 PM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

You have to remember the surpluses we had in FY99 and FY00 were the result of many companies cooking the books, a NASDAQ market that went up 150% from late 98 to early 2000. The capital gains and income taxes that came in those years that were unrealistic. Had we just had a very good period of 30% increase we still would have been about even without counting the money borrowed from Social Security.

It's just amazing when you look back at Clinton's 2nd term. We had 3 chances to get Bin Laden, didn't do it. We knew ATTa was here and they let him go in 2000. The corporate corruption was rampant, and he told us Iraq had WMD's, we bombed them and then let it go. UN Oil for Food was going on during this period. The Chinese missile technology was passed. The North Korean nuclear bad deal, etc. ALL THIS IN CLINTON's 2nd Term and the REPUBLICANS have let the RATS blame it all on BUSH. Disgusting!!!!!!!


248 posted on 08/10/2005 10:58:52 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Huck

Party of smaller government my fat ass!


301 posted on 08/11/2005 4:34:57 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Graham Petrie, 1911 - 2005: Rest in Peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson