So some of the things the ME said are facts, but the stuff you don't agree with isn't? I'm confused.
Oh, so you think that when one lies, they lie about everything? IF the M.E. said there was trauma involved, then there would have to be, I would believe, a police investigation.
Do you honestly think that he was not pressured into making sure that whatever was put on his report, he was told to make certain that whatever he says, make sure the report is not an impetus for an investigation into the extremely suspicious circumstances surrounding the night of her collapse?
It's probably about as confusing as "Able Danger" is to the 9-11 Commission. Or what "is" is.
Oftentimes, especially in high profile matters, only things on the agenda are printed or attended to....unforutnately, if that means the actually truth is not part of the agenda, it gets buried. Part of the agenda here appears to be saving some people's jobs/necks. Which begs the question: why? You realize, of course, for the people behind this matter, it really is NOT about Terri...it's about something more sinister at stake.