Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2

I'll take your comment as corroboration, since I can't interpret it as disagreement in any way that makes sense.


26 posted on 08/09/2005 7:03:03 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: XEHRpa
It more of an agree and extend. There is no independence of the Supreme Court from the People, only from the other two branches. The SCOTUS is shielded, but not independent. The 1st Amendment would seem to allow dissenting speech of the People wrt the SCOTUS as an institution and as individual Justices.Breyer needs to think a little more before he speaks or renders written opinions.
28 posted on 08/09/2005 7:15:25 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Don't Tread on Me; Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson