Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: Crackingham
Tell him to read the Constitution instead of the newspapers. That would "keep him on target" and relieve him of bad press. Presto, no more worries.
58 posted on
08/09/2005 2:47:22 PM PDT by
GingisK
To: Crackingham
Breyer is a scumbag who legislates from the bench like a political hack.
If the scumbag just did his own job and let the state and federal legislatures do theirs, and at the same time stayed away from initiatives that were passed overwhelmingly by voters, then the scumbag wouldn't have to worry about "political criticism".
To: Crackingham
Ya can't make this dung up BUMP!!
61 posted on
08/09/2005 3:07:26 PM PDT by
conservativecorner
(It's a cult of death and submission to fanatics Larry!!)
To: Crackingham
Maybe instead of ruling based on a desire to be accepted by Eastern liberal intelligensia, he is starting to worry about being accepted by those who value the Constitution.
62 posted on
08/09/2005 3:08:28 PM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: Crackingham
Breyer said the nine-member court is focused on constitutional limits on major fights of the day. "We're sort of at the outer bounds. And we can't control politics of it, and I don't think you want us to try to control politics of it," he said. Which is why you approved CFR?
64 posted on
08/09/2005 3:18:23 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Crackingham
Breyer get your head out of your a#@.
65 posted on
08/09/2005 3:19:57 PM PDT by
pankot
To: Crackingham
"rulings on difficult subjects like gay rights and the death penalty have left courts vulnerable to political attacks that are threatening judicial independence."What about "Eminent Domain", Stephen??? (Are you paying attention, Justice Souter???) Maybe a little political--and economic--pressure on Supreme Court Justices is not such a bad thing, huh???
66 posted on
08/09/2005 3:35:25 PM PDT by
Savage Beast
(Love is the ultimate aphrodisiac!)
To: Crackingham
Look like the Marxists in black robes are getting a bit crispy around the edges from all the fire they're taking.
68 posted on
08/09/2005 3:37:59 PM PDT by
sergeantdave
(Member of Arbor Day Foundation, travelling the country and destroying open space)
To: Crackingham
Absolutely no mention of the Kelo decision on eminent domain.
69 posted on
08/09/2005 3:38:39 PM PDT by
Hostage
To: Crackingham
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Tuesday that rulings on difficult subjects like gay rights and the death penalty have left courts vulnerable to political attacks that are threatening judicial independence. Breyer urged lawyers to help educate people about court responsibility to be an independent decision-maker There would be no problem if they stuck to the wording and original meaning of the Constitution, the U.S. Constitution that is.
70 posted on
08/09/2005 3:52:23 PM PDT by
El Gato
To: Crackingham
He should have stuck to making the flavourless imitation of Dreyer's ice cream.
72 posted on
08/09/2005 4:00:53 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: Crackingham
If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
75 posted on
08/09/2005 4:02:33 PM PDT by
BlessedBeGod
(Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
To: Crackingham
76 posted on
08/09/2005 4:02:45 PM PDT by
planekT
To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
78 posted on
08/09/2005 4:03:46 PM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: Crackingham
79 posted on
08/09/2005 4:05:19 PM PDT by
tutstar
( <{{--->< OurFlorida.true.ws Impeach Judge Greer)
To: Crackingham
I don't think you want us to try to control politics of it
Is that a threat?
81 posted on
08/09/2005 4:09:41 PM PDT by
SittinYonder
(America is the Last Beach)
To: Crackingham
Breyer defended using overseas legal opinions as a guide only, adding, "It has hit a political nerve." Yes. It hits me right in my "unacceptable" nerve.
To: Crackingham
Fortunately, they haven't tried to import one sort of foreign law--Sharia-just quite yet. But what's to stop them if foreign laws are cited as precedents or models?
91 posted on
08/09/2005 5:08:11 PM PDT by
wildbill
To: Crackingham
If we do not protect our courts, our courts cannot protect us," Greco said.
__________________________________________________
Can somebody tell me what this means? The court is supposed to uphold the constitution, not protect us. Its a legal document. We don't need protecting.
Why ,pray tell, are we supposed to "protect" the court? From what? From whom? No wonder we are in such a judicial quandary.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson