Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Admin. Knew of 9/11 Hijackers
NewsMax ^ | 8/9/05

Posted on 08/09/2005 11:50:47 AM PDT by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Txsleuth
Unfortunately, Gorelick's role in creating the "Wall" was widely known in conservative circles, including here at FR and it got no where with the Administration, the Commission or the MSM.
21 posted on 08/09/2005 12:06:56 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
But the critical information was not acted on, at least in part, because of prohibitions against intelligence sharing implemented by former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, who was reportedly installed in her post at the insistence of then-first lady Hillary Clinton.

And was put on the 9/11 Commission to insure that the facts disclosed in this article did not become public and hurt herself and the Clintons. The Freepers knew all about the Golick connection and the prohibitions put in place by the Clinton Administration but it never broke through to the biased MSM. It was clear that the reason for this prohibition was to make certain that things known about the Clintons by the Intelligence Community did not make it to the desk of some "renegade" FBI agent who just might want to make a fuss. It worked. At the cost of 3000 lives on 9/11.

22 posted on 08/09/2005 12:08:54 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Of course Clinton having people like Larry Johnson on board telling everyone that al Quaeda was no threat did not help.
------
The criminal incompetence and corruption of the left just continues to unfold. I just don't really know who is the bigger enemy...?...the socialist left IN AMERICA, or the terrorists ???


23 posted on 08/09/2005 12:08:57 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Weldon comes across as a kook to some but he is a well-informed person this country is not taking advantage of....he correctly predicted the election results in Iran a week before the final results.


24 posted on 08/09/2005 12:10:15 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Rush just covered this today.


25 posted on 08/09/2005 12:10:32 PM PDT by mathluv (Mercy shown to an evil man is cruelty to the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: peacebaby
BTW, what WAS in those papers Sandy Berger stuffed down his pants?

It's obvious that the Dems and the Repubs don't want you and me to ever know.

I'm betting it was damning to both parties.

26 posted on 08/09/2005 12:11:07 PM PDT by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: peacebaby

It was on C-span about noon....it will probably be repeated on c-span...keep checking.


27 posted on 08/09/2005 12:11:14 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Free Republic is #1!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: areafiftyone

The regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001" had no CLUE as to the dangerous forces they were dealing with. This was a law enforcement problem, so far as they were concerned, and NOT a priority in their universe. For if laws WERE to be enforced, they would be in SO much trouble, as many of the members of that regime were technically NOT in compliance with some number of statutes or legal requirements at any given time.


29 posted on 08/09/2005 12:11:32 PM PDT by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
But the critical information was not acted on, at least in part, because of prohibitions against intelligence sharing implemented by former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, who was reportedly installed in her post at the insistence of then-first lady Hillary Clinton.

Hillary again.

30 posted on 08/09/2005 12:12:29 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
this was a law enforcement problem, so far as they were concerned

Hmmmm where did I hear that before? Oh yea Mr. French - John Kerry wasn't it?

31 posted on 08/09/2005 12:13:19 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: travlnmn41

I bet Janine Pirro will.......( I can't wait). People will have to at one time or another REALIZE the Clinton administation and their band of thugs (I include the MSM in this) posed the utmost danger to this country than any adminstation in my lifetime. They KNEW who to put in positions that would enable them to meet their goals, take the falls to keep them in power at all costs! Hopefully by the grace of God the people will learn and soon!


32 posted on 08/09/2005 12:13:27 PM PDT by Dawgreg (Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

God help our country if she is ever elected president!


33 posted on 08/09/2005 12:13:54 PM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

It has to be broadcast more so that the average person knows. Rush is a good start.


34 posted on 08/09/2005 12:14:15 PM PDT by sine_nomine (Protect the weakest of the weak - the unborn babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

>>>>So when will this be splashed across the front page of the Post and Times in big letters?

Well, the article was splashed on the front page of the Times today.


35 posted on 08/09/2005 12:14:22 PM PDT by NC28203
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: travlnmn41

But the critical information was not acted on, at least in part, because of prohibitions against intelligence sharing implemented by former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, who was reportedly installed in her post at the insistence of then-first lady Hillary Clinton."

Like any good wife, Hill was just doing her best to keep hubby out of jail. As a backwater ambulance chaser, I'm sure she had no clue what the consequences of manipulating national security agencies might have.


36 posted on 08/09/2005 12:14:33 PM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
More than a year before the 9/11 attacks, Clinton administration intelligence officials had identified four of the 19 9/11 hijackers as a terrorist threat - including al-Qaida team leader Mohamed Atta and his partner Marwan al-Shehhi, whose planes destroyed the World Trade Center and killed over 2,700 people.



"And we told Bush"...Sputter..Sputter..

Clinton spin.
37 posted on 08/09/2005 12:15:21 PM PDT by CAWats (Most women find me utterly fascinating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Is Gorelick a lawyer? The fact that she didn't recuse herself from that farce of a commission should be an ethics violation worthy of disbarment at the least. Or is her defense to those charges that the commission was a farce?

I for one don't really fault Gorelick for refusing to recuse herself. Anyone on that commission with a shred of integrity would have stood up and threatened to resign in disgust if the commission didn't throw her @ss out the door.

I knew that whole 9/11 commission was a farce as soon as they put a couple of mediocre sh!ts like Tom Kean and Bob Kerrey in charge of it.

38 posted on 08/09/2005 12:15:59 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
NY Times Report: Military Knew 9/11 Hijackers Before Attacks they know
39 posted on 08/09/2005 12:17:08 PM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

You're not kidding!


40 posted on 08/09/2005 12:18:12 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson