How you come up with that lamebrain idea is beyond me - but then your twisted logic is beyond me as well.
But is has become abundantly clear that you wish to see the small family farm go the way of the buggy whip in favor of corporate conglomerate farming. They are the ones who benefit from subsidies, not small farms and definitely not the consumers.
So in addition to wasteful, inefficient sue of taxpayer dollars, and larger government, we can add corporate welfare to the list of your support regarding said government. SHEESH................
If you can't understand that a food surplus is better than a food shortage, then any type of logic is beyond you.
But is has become abundantly clear that you wish to see the small family farm go the way of the buggy whip in favor of corporate conglomerate farming. They are the ones who benefit from subsidies, not small farms and definitely not the consumers.
So in addition to wasteful, inefficient sue of taxpayer dollars, and larger government, we can add corporate welfare to the list of your support regarding said government.
Ooooooooooooo.... "corporate welfare"..... !!!
Where'd ya get those talking points, Gabz???
Ralph Nader??? Jesse Jackson??? Molly Ivins??? Maxine Waters??? Hillary Klinton???
Or did that pathetic rambling actually germinate in your own little pea-brain???
Corporate farming has gone global, ninny.
It's become more profitable to sell U.S. landholdings to developers and import food from property acquired in Latin America for a fraction of domestic land prices.
You're a fraud, Gabz.
Spare us your disingenuous concern for family farmers.
They're actually the target of your backstabbing idiocy.
True, patriotic conservatives should be embarrassed by your sniveling drivel.