Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Appears Headed for a Peanut Surplus
Yahoo - AP ^ | August 9, 2005 | ELLIOTT MINOR

Posted on 08/09/2005 10:24:44 AM PDT by Hi Heels

U.S. Appears Headed for a Peanut Surplus By ELLIOTT MINOR, Associated Press Writer Tue Aug 9, 5:35 AM ET

ALBANY, Ga. - Peanuts in storage plus peanuts in the field.

Right now, the United States has too many peanuts and that, experts say, could be bad news for the peanut commodity program unless something is done to whittle down the piles.

"We're afraid if we cost the government a lot of money, we'll get less in the next farm bill," said Tyron Spearman, executive director of the National Peanut Buying Points Association.

Some 215,000 tons of peanuts are still unsold from the 2004 crop and agricultural officials predict growers will produce another 2.3 million tons this year, Spearman said.

Despite recent growth in peanut consumption, Americans use only about 1.6 million tons a year and another 300,000 to 400,000 tons are exported.

That leaves a surplus of about 485,000 tons.

Farmers won't lose because their government crop program guarantees them $355 per ton. The losers could be federal taxpayers who pay the difference between the guaranteed price and the actual market value of the peanuts.

Low peanut prices increase government costs, while higher prices reduce government costs.

Last year's 2.1 million ton crop peanut crop has already cost the government $320 million, said Spearman, who spoke Friday at the Georgia Peanut Producers Association's annual buying point meeting. The 416 buying points stretching from New Mexico to Virginia buy peanuts from the farmer and grade them before shipping them to shelling plants or storage warehouses.

Georgia Sen. Saxby Chambliss (news, bio, voting record), chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, addressed legislative issues and the outlook for the new farm bill, which will be approved by Congress in 2007.

Costly commodity programs tend to be singled out in Congress, but Chambliss said the 2002 Farm Bill, which created the new peanut program, is successful and the peanut program has been a bargain most years.

"There's always somebody who wants to take a shot at the peanut program," said Chambliss, who challenged the industry to find new uses of peanuts.

Peanut acreage has increased after the elimination of the old Depression-era peanut program in 2002. That opened the door for peanut farming in new areas.

This year, more farmers opted to grow peanuts because it seemed to have the best economic potential when compared with cotton, corn and soybeans, Spearman said. As a result, peanut acreage increased 25 percent in Georgia and 15 percent nationwide.

Growers have been grumbling for several years that the U.S. Department of Agriculture's "posted price," the price U.S. peanuts can be sold on the world market, is too high and is pricing American peanuts out of the market. The current posted price is $337 per ton.

Stanley Fletcher, a University of Georgia agricultural economist who specializes in peanuts, said USDA officials could increase demand for American peanuts by lowering the posted price, but it would increase government costs.

"If we don't move the prices, we're going to have a lot sitting there," he said in a phone interview Thursday. "Prices have to move down to move them into the marketplace."

Spearman said U.S. shelled peanuts are currently selling for $850 per metric ton in Europe, compared with $695 per ton for peanuts from Argentina and $725 per ton for peanuts from China.

"Everybody is looking for an answer, but no one knows what the USDA is going to do," Spearman said.

Chambliss, noting that he'd been given a golf shirt made from corn the day before in Minnesota, urged the industry to "get creative" and increase peanut demand.

Then, reflecting on potential uses of peanuts, he said, "I don't know if we can make golf shirts out of it."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: 109th; agriculture; oilfornuts; peanutgallery; peanuts; usda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: You Dirty Rats

I'm LMAO right along side of you........how bizarre.


61 posted on 08/09/2005 11:47:32 AM PDT by Gabz (Smoking ban supporters are in favor of the Kelo ruling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

You've said it all in a nutshell about the increases in allergies and asthma attacks - particularly amongst children.

the only reason my 7yo isn't outside playing right now is it is pouring rain.....so she's been curled up with a book reading to the dogs :)


62 posted on 08/09/2005 11:50:36 AM PDT by Gabz (Smoking ban supporters are in favor of the Kelo ruling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Gee, I feel better already. LOL


63 posted on 08/09/2005 11:56:00 AM PDT by fish hawk (hollow points were made to hold pig lard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels
The reason we are in this peanut mess is the interference of government in the market. Why should the taxpayers guarantee minimum prices to peanut farmers or any other farmers for that matter? I suppose Jimmy Carter will get his share of the federal swag.
64 posted on 08/09/2005 12:08:39 PM PDT by The Great RJ (rtable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Reading a book to the dogs on a rainy day. *sigh* To be young again.


65 posted on 08/09/2005 12:49:53 PM PDT by Hi Heels (Guns kill and cause crime? Dang, mine must be malfunctioning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
taxpayers supporting one segment of the population at the expense of another is not my idea of good,

A bountiful agricultural surplus benefits everybody, Gabz.
Your "idea" to produce food shortages "more efficiently" is not only pure idiocy, it is also evil.

66 posted on 08/09/2005 12:57:21 PM PDT by Willie Green (Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

If we could only use peanut oil to power our vehicles...


67 posted on 08/09/2005 1:59:08 PM PDT by knittnmom (...surrounded by reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Unless caused by a natural disaster (which no government price support can prevent or control) food shortages like you predict simply will not happen in the US. Modern agribusiness pretty much knows what the consumer wants to buy and will produce it as long a money is to be made. There is no need of a government guarantee of how much money will be made. Sure some spikes and dips in certain commodity prices will occur just like any market but we will have no overall food shortage. One year beef may be cheap next year chicken.
68 posted on 08/09/2005 2:24:03 PM PDT by nomorelurker (wetraginhell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

LOL!!!!

When the power went out shortly after I made that post, she got an even bigger treat, mommy joined them for the reading time :)

Of course it has since stopped raining - so that means more laundry, 'cause what she was wearing is rather wet and muddy :)


69 posted on 08/09/2005 4:03:54 PM PDT by Gabz (Smoking ban supporters are in favor of the Kelo ruling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Taking part of my comment out of context only dilutes your already outlandish comments.

A bountiful agricultural surplus benefits everybody, Gabz.

I never said any such thing.......I agreed with you that it is wasteful and inefficient. Your support shows your support of wasteful, inefficient government via taxpayer subsidies.

Your "idea" to produce food shortages "more efficiently" is not only pure idiocy, it is also evil.

You obviously have me mixed up with someone else.........food rotting in warehouses because of falsely inflated prices is the idiocy.

There will be no food shortages with a gradual elimination of the subsidies. In fact I see the opposite, because prices will decline and there won't be all the waste because more people will be able to afford the stuff that is currently rotting in warehouses.

70 posted on 08/09/2005 4:17:26 PM PDT by Gabz (Smoking ban supporters are in favor of the Kelo ruling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
There will be no food shortages with a gradual elimination of the subsidies. In fact I see the opposite, because prices will decline

Initially, prices will decline below the cost of production, forcing more farmers out of business.
Then, with fewer farmers in production, shortages will cause prices to skyrocket when we experience a season of adverse growing conditions.

It's better to have surplus food than shortages, Gabz, even if some of it winds up rotting in warehouses.

Or are you just one of those people who enjoy inflicting hunger and starvation on others?

71 posted on 08/09/2005 7:15:22 PM PDT by Willie Green (Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

It's Carter's fault. My husband and I bought t-shirts back in the 70's that said, "Goobers today, Gonners tomorrow". That was during those "nutty" Carter years. Wish I still had those shirts. They might be worth something now. It sure turned heads back then. I wondered then if ole Billy (Carter) had them made up to make a quick dime for his drinkin' habit. ;)


72 posted on 08/09/2005 7:28:54 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

I'll bump that thought....."*sigh* To be young again. Then again....reading a book to the dogs on a rainy day sounds like just the thing we could only DREAM about doing when we were younger. So turn the page, enjoy the moment, and "woof woof" to your doggies. :)


73 posted on 08/09/2005 7:32:42 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Prices of what will decline below the cost of production? No they will not. We all have to eat it's real simple get it. Farmers will produce food to sell: if there is a shortage guess what they will make more money: no shortage make less. Just because the market and price vary does keep most of the rest of the economy from working, same for food if not more so. It's perhaps the most basic commodity it does not need a government program/subsidy to function.
74 posted on 08/09/2005 7:32:44 PM PDT by nomorelurker (wetraginhell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

Is there currently any other US commodity which has the protection of a cartel--for which the only farmers who may grow the product must belong to the cartel?


...mumbles stuff about carter...bad stuff.


75 posted on 08/09/2005 7:35:33 PM PDT by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels
Right now, the United States has too many peanuts and that, experts say, could be bad news for the peanut commodity program unless something is done to whittle down the piles...

Give me some! I love peanuts.

76 posted on 08/09/2005 7:37:06 PM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels
Low peanut prices increase government costs, while higher prices reduce government costs.

BWAHHHH HAAA HAAH AHHAA!!!!

77 posted on 08/09/2005 7:38:12 PM PDT by LifeOrGoods? (God is not a God of fear, but of power, love and a sane mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels
THE SCENE: Professor Shabazz K. Morton (Eddie Murphy) is sitting in a big brown chair in what appears to be a study. Behind him are a fern and a bookshelf. Professor Morton is waiting for the audience to cease its laughter. Incidentally, while he pronounces it "Morton," the closed captioning reads "Martin."

PROFESSOR SHABAZZ K. MORTON: I don't see what's so funny. Hello, my name is Professor Shabazz K. Morton. In 1895, at the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, a black man named George Washington Carver developed a new method of soul, soil improvement through crop rotation. (the audience laughs) So I messed up. Shut up! (the audience laughs again and applauds) Stop clapping before y'all make me smile! To end the South's agricultural dependence on cotton alone. As a result, Carver came up with hundreds of industrial uses for the peanut. Sure industrial uses. Meanwhile, one night, he's having a few friends over to his house for dinner, and one of them leans over and says to Doctor Carver, "Excuse me, George. What's that you puttin' on your bread?" And Carver says, "Oh, that's nothing but a butter substitute that I made from peanuts. I can't digest all that animal fat, you know." So, the other fella tastes it and he says, "Hmm. This pastes pretty, this tastes..." (the audience laughs again) Yeah, keep on smiling. "This tastes pretty good, man. Mind if we take a peek at the recipe?" And Doctor Carver says, "Take a peek? Heh. Man, you can have it. Who's gonna make, eat butter made out of peanuts? No, no, I'm working on the method to compress peanuts into phonograph needles." So, Doctor Carver's two dinner guests, Edward "Skippy" Williamson and Frederick "Jif" Armstrong, two white men, stole George Washington Carver's recipe for peanut butter, copyrighted it, and reaped untold fortunes from it, while Doctor Carver died penniless and insane, still trying to play a phonograph record with a peanut. This has been Black History Minute. I'm Shabazz K. Morton. Good night.

78 posted on 08/09/2005 7:40:04 PM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwæt! Lãr biþ mæst hord, soþlïce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nomorelurker
Prices of what will decline below the cost of production?

Staple food crops.

No they will not. We all have to eat it's real simple get it.

Do you understand the term "surplus"???

surplus = MORE than what we can eat.

During seasons with favorable growing conditions, farmers produce a surplus which drives the market price of their crops BELOW the cost of production. This forces many farmers OUT of business.

if there is a shortage guess what they will make more money:

Yes, prices skyrocket during shortages.
And people who cannot afford those prices go hungry.
Others may not go hungry, but they'll scream bloody murder about food prices and toss all the jack@$$ politicians out of office.

79 posted on 08/09/2005 7:53:12 PM PDT by Willie Green (Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Hi Heels

This is a prime example of why ALL government farm subsidies should end. If you cannot make it as a farmer without government subsidies, then that is God's way of telling you that you should do something else for a living. It is also the market's way of saying that we have too many farmers.


80 posted on 08/09/2005 7:59:45 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson