Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Relieves General of His Command
Army Web Site | Aug 8, 05 | Army Web Page

Posted on 08/09/2005 7:41:36 AM PDT by SLB

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-191 next last
To: antiRepublicrat

And you know this, how???????????


61 posted on 08/09/2005 10:17:59 AM PDT by sasafras (Enforce the border, take away all the benefits and penalize employers who hire illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny; FreedomPoster

Rummy did a good job of deflecting the question. When the time is right the answers will come out.


62 posted on 08/09/2005 10:25:31 AM PDT by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SLB

Just as I thought, Rummy deflected the first question. That will be it for now but the nature of the General's misconduct will come out soon, I'm sure.


63 posted on 08/09/2005 10:25:46 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB

How'd you know what I was going to say? ;)


64 posted on 08/09/2005 10:26:43 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Looks like great minds post the same :-)

Have a great day.


65 posted on 08/09/2005 10:26:58 AM PDT by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

We gotta quit doing this. Folks will start to gossip.


66 posted on 08/09/2005 10:27:57 AM PDT by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

No doubt the general was sacked for his comparison of the Army to the Marine Corps.


67 posted on 08/09/2005 10:28:53 AM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SLB

I didn't realize, until I read that latest AP article, that Recruiting Command came under TRADOC. I just wonder if it has something to do with recruiting numbers? As in cooking the books?


68 posted on 08/09/2005 10:30:18 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

> As in cooking the books?

You can inflate the number of potential recruits in the
funnel, but you can't fake the number who get off the
bus for BT. This is not likely a recruiting issue.


69 posted on 08/09/2005 10:35:56 AM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend
Could this be related to not meeting recruitment goals?

Not likely, recruiting is not in the mission of TraDoc.

70 posted on 08/09/2005 10:38:12 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Do you think AP's Robert Burns is wrong?


71 posted on 08/09/2005 10:41:33 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; leadpenny

Recruiting Command's higher headquarters in the Accessions Command which in turn is a portion of TRADOC. We are in line to get the Accessions Command here at Ft Knox under BRAC.


72 posted on 08/09/2005 10:45:36 AM PDT by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Actually it's opposite. Things can get awkward if you're not Judeo-Christian, especially in officer land.

Having been in the Army and spending a lot of time around officer land. Many of the Army's social functions are religious in nature, and officers are pretty much required to be involved in these social functions. Being an atheist in such a case can be awkward.

Even in Basic, at least when I went, those who wanted to go to church on Sunday could, while the rest would be assigned various duties, such as clean-up, etc. That right there gives favor to the Christian.

73 posted on 08/09/2005 10:54:33 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SLB

I was just roaming around Yahoo and never did find the difference between the Accessions Command and USAREC. So the two star at Recruiting Command comes under a three star at TRADOC?


74 posted on 08/09/2005 10:56:21 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; leadpenny

From the TRADOC home page:

The U.S. Army Accessions Command (USAAC) was established by general order on 15 February 2002. It is a subordinate command of TRADOC charged with providing integrated command and control of the recruiting and initial military training for the Army's officer, warrant officer, and enlisted forces. Designed to meet the human resource needs of the Army from first handshake to first unit of assignment, the command transforms volunteers into soldiers and leaders for the Army.


75 posted on 08/09/2005 11:01:29 AM PDT by SLB ("We must lay before Him what is in us, not what ought to be in us." C. S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend
Could this be related to not meeting recruitment goals?

No, but it could be related to not meeting training goals. I know the Army isn't pushing as many troops out of the various training pipelines as it would like to. TRADOC is HUGE and spread all over the world. Wallace, a man with extensive staff, training and combat experience, should be just the man to get it into shape.

76 posted on 08/09/2005 11:02:48 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Do you think AP's Robert Burns is wrong?

He's a reporter, so you never know. :) But in this case I stand corrected. It's what I get for not checking the latest org chart.

77 posted on 08/09/2005 11:09:13 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SLB

I saw that and I believe I saw that a three star is in charge of it. Somewhere else I clicked on Recruiting Command and it took me to a site where they were trying to enlist me in the Army. I have to say that the TRADOC site appears to be a work in progress. But, if they are like many other offices around an undermanned Army, people are probably running around with their hair fire there also.


78 posted on 08/09/2005 11:09:22 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; SLB

No harm. I thought you knew something different. SLB is near some of that stuff, so he's got the inside track.


79 posted on 08/09/2005 11:12:02 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Many of the Army's social functions are religious in nature, and officers are pretty much required to be involved in these social functions

Social Functions such as? Or are you just objecting to "Under God" in the pledge or a prayer at a social function. I can't imagine the ACLU would have allowed religious social functions. FWIW, I never even heard of any religious social functions when I was an Air Force officer.

80 posted on 08/09/2005 11:12:17 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson