Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narby
Here's evidence that at one time they tried ... and failed.

So you are saying that this:

I've seen enough in the field to realize that quite substantial portions of the geologic record are not the direct result of the Flood.

was a failure?

Are you saying the geological record is due to the flood and the person you cited failed in his conclusion that the geological record is not due to the floood?

Are you a 4000 year old Earth advocate?

62 posted on 08/13/2005 12:14:51 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: tallhappy
I accept that the earth is around 4 billion years old.

I didn't italicize it, but the majority of that post was an excerpt from the link at the top. I didn't write it.

What it tells is about the efforts made by creationist scientists to geologically prove that the earth was young. They failed, and being honest creationists, they changed their view on the age of the earth.

I get an idea that religious people were more open minded about the issue back when they did the research. But over the last few decades there's been lots of preaching that one must believe the Bible literally. That's polarized the issue, meaning that religious people have become a near cult. If your in the cult, it appears powerful and strong. But they're isolated away from the American mainstream that they once were in the center of.

64 posted on 08/13/2005 7:45:42 AM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson