Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush 44? [Jeb Bush for President]
Opinion Journal ^ | Aug 9, 2005 | BRENDAN MINITER

Posted on 08/09/2005 3:06:48 AM PDT by The Raven

He denies he's even interested, and a long list of political analysts have already written him off with the belief that the appearance of political nepotism would be too unseemly for voters to put the brother of the current president in the Oval Office. But in politics timing is everything, and as the clock advances towards 2008, things are starting to fall into place to give Jeb Bush the momentum he needs to win the White House. And this isn't contingent on Hillary Clinton emerging as the Democrats' nominee--though if she does, the path will be all the smoother for another Bush.

Let's first dispense with the idea that Jeb's biggest liability would be his last name. Since when does name recognition hurt in politics? It's true that many of this brother's political adversaries would simply cross out "George" in their campaign literature and ink in "Jeb" above it. MoveOn.org and other Democratic interest groups would find plenty of willing donors. George Soros would likely make another multimillion-dollar pledge to drive the Bushes from Washington. But then again, they did all that last time, and we aren't discussing who will challenge President Kerry.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2bushesisenough; 2bushssoldusout; bush; bush44; bushsaretraitors; cantstomachabush; compassionmyass; fckallbushs; findsomeoneelse; flfavoritegov; florida; hellno2abush; impeachthisbush; jeb2008; jebbush; no2onemoretraitor; nomobushes; nomorebushesever; nomoreglobalists; nonogodno; nononononononohellno; notanotherone; notinthislifetime; notjustnohellno; president2008; president2012; presidentwhenever; screwallbushs; screwthebushes; terrikiller; theglobalistunboys; theysoldusout; theywant2owntheworld; traitorsamongus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-230 next last
To: JohnnyZ

Wow, you go from me saying that there are some good things about everyone to being a Clinton lover. Now who needs some lessons in reading comprehension?


No Bush Dynasties!!!! We need somebody else to run.


141 posted on 08/09/2005 11:51:18 AM PDT by Sentis (Visit the Conservative Hollywood http://www.boondockexpansionist.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Is Jeb a social conservative?

Yes.

Would he vetoed signed McCain-Feingold?.........

I don't know how many federal issues he's commented on. I would have to research that. On the state level he's been very conservative.

142 posted on 08/09/2005 12:01:22 PM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I believe abortion should be safe and legal in this country." -- Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: commonasdirt

I agree. W has actually been quite the anomaly versus the norms for that family. I really never cared for H.W. - far too liberal and lame. Jeb, if nominated, might seriously underwhelm, ala Dole. Or, if elected, he'd likely be a one termer. We need to tap into the same energy we did for 1980.


143 posted on 08/09/2005 12:07:20 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the"and Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sentis

We need to get into real Sunbelt types. None of the Bushes fit what I am describing. They had / have portable wealth. They did not make their wealth in the Sunbelt - they made it in NYC. A true Sunbelt man (or woman) would truly bring the red state essence in a passionate way that no child of privalidge can muster.


144 posted on 08/09/2005 12:09:49 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the"and Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

That is a key point. We must not forget it. We MUST not! We MUST WIN!


145 posted on 08/09/2005 12:15:26 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the"and Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cuteconservativechick

The innate tendency of the Bush family tends to be toward the left not the right.


146 posted on 08/09/2005 12:16:46 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the"and Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sentis
Bush is at best a compromise candidate and only won the last election due to the democrats putting up an even more compromised candidate. Lets not fool ourselves into believing our victory was driven by anything more than the Democrats inability to choose a good candidate.

I agree with a lot of that. But the Demos have deep problems. I'd say the problem is that there is only one credible pro-America PARTY. It's not as if a good party accidentally nominated a bad candidate. Their party is seriously flawed. But in general, I agee. GWB benefitted from a lack of real competition. Then again, Reagan got to run against Carter and Mondale. Not exactly hall of famers.

147 posted on 08/09/2005 12:38:19 PM PDT by Huck (Whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
A true Sunbelt man (or woman) would truly bring the red state essence in a passionate way that no child of privalidge can muster.

Red State Essence? Wow, that's ..... something. God forbid we nominate someone from a battleground state. 'Cause none of those people have passion, I guess.

"Privilege"

148 posted on 08/09/2005 12:41:38 PM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I believe abortion should be safe and legal in this country." -- Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Huck

The thing about Reagan was that he proved himself as a great man in office and won by a landslide his second term. Bush's claim to fame is that he did a decent job in the aftermath of 9/11. I reserve judgement on how he is protecting America after 9/11 because his stance on illegals leads me to think he doesn't care about security as much as he claims. If there was no war and no 9/11 most Republicans would already have dropped him and his moderate to left leanings would be constantly discussed here.

Bush is the worst type of Republican we could possibly get he is socially conservative and financially liberal.


149 posted on 08/09/2005 12:49:16 PM PDT by Sentis (Visit the Conservative Hollywood http://www.boondockexpansionist.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

"Jeb, if nominated, might seriously underwhelm, ala Dole."

Funny, when I read the last word in that line, Dole, the first thing in my mind was how I would have loved to see Elizabeth Dole try for high office. She has always impressed me in certain ways more than her hubby.

We are looking for a viable candidate for the presidency in '08, not best in show based on bloodline at the Westminster Dog Show. And your assessment on the idea "underwhelm" is right on the mark GOP_1900AD.


150 posted on 08/09/2005 12:50:36 PM PDT by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Sentis

I agree with your basic point. And yes, Reagan was definitely self made. No question about that.


151 posted on 08/09/2005 12:51:26 PM PDT by Huck (Whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Sentis
Bush is the worst type of Republican we could possibly get he is socially conservative and financially liberal.

I agree with this also.

152 posted on 08/09/2005 12:51:59 PM PDT by Huck (Whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Dawgreg
Better a Bush dynasty than a Clinton dynasty

No dynasty is the better choice.

153 posted on 08/09/2005 12:52:46 PM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #154 Removed by Moderator

To: Huck

You will probably not find a trust fund baby who is financially conservative they very rarely have had to think about the consequences of overspending.


155 posted on 08/09/2005 12:54:45 PM PDT by Sentis (Visit the Conservative Hollywood http://www.boondockexpansionist.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Sentis

That's a good point. Most of the "fortunate sons" I know are screw ups. Never had to work for it, born with a sense of privelage, the feeling that someone (dad's wallet) will always bail them out, etc.


156 posted on 08/09/2005 1:01:20 PM PDT by Huck (Whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: The Raven

Not that I endorse Jeb, but here's a campaign ad I'd like to see:

Jeb: "J. Bush here, with the secret recipe for a stronger America! We need to implement a flat tax system, get control of our borders, and scale back the size of the federal government. One other candidate knows the secret recipe, but SHE'S not talking!"

(clip of Hillary plays): "Many of you are well enough off that the tax cuts may have helped you! We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good!"

Jeb: "Hillary."

Paid for by the Jeb Bush for President Campaign.


157 posted on 08/09/2005 1:01:31 PM PDT by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

While I am against another Bush in the white house that is a hilarious idea for a commercial


158 posted on 08/09/2005 1:07:01 PM PDT by Sentis (Visit the Conservative Hollywood http://www.boondockexpansionist.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: chris1
You vote for who you like and I'll make up my own mind about who I want to vote for. I like Jeb.
159 posted on 08/09/2005 3:34:46 PM PDT by Shawndell Green (Mecca delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SouthCarolinaKit
There would have to be a very nasty Democrat in the race before I would vote for McCain.
160 posted on 08/09/2005 3:35:44 PM PDT by Shawndell Green (Mecca delenda est!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-230 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson