Posted on 08/08/2005 10:19:33 PM PDT by doug from upland
So...is this plant coming from Cox or from Hitlery?
"Not getting the irony"
Oh you A-hole
It's too late at night for that!
Funny though
I am late to this thread, and have read only your initial posting, no comments yet - I don't know anything about this JEANINE PIRRO, but you have written a pretty good bio for one Hilary Clinton. Two people with the same 'credentials'?
DFU, You sure know how to raise the blood pressure for a few minutes don't you?
Does Greta know about yhis?
Jeanine has no chance to win.
She's losing in the polls like 69% to 31%
Only Rudy can beat Hillary.
I didn't get the reference for #1, but 2-6 were individually clear. :)
Do you live in NY?
You don't live in the tri-state area, do you?
nice doug...he he
I got it after reading #5. There's no one like her.
Great post!
Ha. If you think that's bad, you should see who she's running against.
What do you know about NY politics?
Rudy has absolutely no desire to be a Senator, he wants to be President. I don't see it happening, but good luck to him .
Jeanine has an actual chance to pull Hillary into a very close race and force her to spend tons of loot from the war chest she has raised for POTUS.
Jeanine is Lebanese. She is Roman Catholic. She has a strong record, and in a debate will make Hillary look weak and duh-mb.
Stranger things have happened. Jeanine has my vote, and my money.
If you happened to live in New York you could vote for the other frontrunner in the race, Ed Cox, son-in-law of Pres. Richard Nixon, who is pro-life. I am as pro-life as it gets, but sometimes you have to face reality. Out here in la-la land I am fortunate to live in a conservative district where the congressman has always been pro-life in my memory. The two dem. senators currently from Calif. would never get my vote; and I always vote pro-life in senate races if there is one available.
The statewide offices in California are a different story since you seldomn see a pro-life candidate for those offices. I always vote for pro-life candidates in primary elections. But when it comes to general elections I usually vote for the most conservative candidate, if both happen to be pro-choice, rather than casting a protest vote. Voting this way is acceptable in the eyes of the Church given the lack of a viable alternative.
I am with you though when it comes to the presidency, as it is our last line of defense for unborn children & other life issues. If the repubs. put up a pro-choice candidate and change the party platform on life issues I will either stay home or vote for someone who is pro-life on the slate.
Catholic Californian
Jeanine would be a fool to run. She'll end up losing a race in which all the dirt will be re-hashed endlessly, essentially ending her career. And for what? To become a speed bump for the democratics?
So poorly camouflaged.
you had me right till the end........good work.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.