If he is man enough to take charge in his future, why would he need a union?
Does not a union act on his behalf, the very antithesis of what you claim?
Collectively a group can do much more than one man alone.
One voice, one letter writer is insignificant in this day and age. Under your premise, why would we need an NRA, or AAA for example? What good is one pitcher without a ball team? You know one firearm owner has no influence in protecting his interest beyond his firing range. Neither does one worker in a cast of millions have an identity
.
A man who takes charge of his future is a man who seeks like minded individuals to work as a group for common cause. The man who chooses to work alone gets nowhere.
Who in your mind would be the most intelligent?
Politicians claim to act in my behalf too because someone elected them. The key is knowing when they are overstepping their authority and putting them back in their place. Once again, one man is nothing in stopping a powerful, well financed enemy. But as a group of like minded people organize, they become a force to be reconned with.
Nice try, but no cigar.