To: Hot Tabasco
"No more Hiroshimas. No more Nagasakis," Ueda said. Pearl Harbors, on the other hand, are perfectly acceptable.
5 posted on
08/08/2005 5:47:39 PM PDT by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
"No more Hiroshimas. No more Nagasakis," Ueda said. We already took care of those two...
22 posted on
08/08/2005 6:02:14 PM PDT by
krb
(ad hominem arguments are for stupid people)
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
These type of people have no idea why the bomb was made. They think it was just a weapon that provokes more killing. The fact that there has been no direct military confrontations between major world powers in 60 years (an unprecedented period) does not dawn on them.
It would probably surprise them that many of the scientists who built the bomb were pacifists. They believed that they were building a weapon that would end major wars. Their plan was absolutely genius. Disarming the world would be the fastest way to WWIII.
27 posted on
08/08/2005 6:08:01 PM PDT by
burzum
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Pearl Harbors, on the other hand, are perfectly acceptable. Hey - they didn't mention Tokyos or Dresdens...think how many incendiaries a B-52 can carry! And those firebombings killed more than the atomic attacks, combined!
41 posted on
08/08/2005 6:42:21 PM PDT by
Tennessee_Bob
("Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson