Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lewislynn
Throughout this study we use a rate of 15 percent, which would offset any losses from tax avoidance beyond the amount that occurs with the current income tax.

The authors of this article don't explain how they came to this conclusion.
34 posted on 08/09/2005 4:19:26 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Man50D

A belated welcome to FRee Republic, Man50D.

The article in question was written in 1997. The Schaefer/Tauzin legislation (H.R. 2001) did not replace Social Security and Medicare taxes, (however it did replace federal excise taxes -- which I think is a good thing) and had a different method to ensure that the necessities of life were tax-FRee.

That is why the rate is different.


35 posted on 08/09/2005 4:31:15 AM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson