Skip to comments.
Reaching for peace [Cindy Sheehan writes an editorial]
The Reporter ^
| Aug 8, 2005
| Cindy Sheehan
Posted on 08/08/2005 4:23:07 PM PDT by upchuck
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
1
posted on
08/08/2005 4:23:08 PM PDT
by
upchuck
To: kristinn; tgslTakoma
Cindy pingers.
Poor, abused woman!
2
posted on
08/08/2005 4:24:14 PM PDT
by
upchuck
("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: upchuck
The US should reach....for the button that launches all the MOABs and Diamond tipped Nukes we got.
3
posted on
08/08/2005 4:25:32 PM PDT
by
samadams2000
(Pitchforks and Lanterns..with a smiley face!)
To: upchuck
One day, her brother, who was at that time in training as a chemical specialist, was sitting in class when FBI agents came in and hauled him off to prison.
As opposed to the MPs? This doesn't sound right.
4
posted on
08/08/2005 4:26:45 PM PDT
by
eastsider
To: upchuck
And the reason dear Cindy that you have any freedom or liberty at all is because of men like your son.
5
posted on
08/08/2005 4:26:51 PM PDT
by
D1X1E
(They should have stopped with "Congress shall make no law.....)
To: eastsider
it shouldn't sound right, she sounds like she has totally lost her mind.
6
posted on
08/08/2005 4:29:45 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: upchuck
I'm getting quite tired of the MSM fawning all over this woman. She's sickening.
To: upchuck
Someone is paying this whacko woman a lot of money to BS like this.
To: upchuck
Same recycled claims and comments and attitudes found in all moonbat propaganda. But, with feelings.
9
posted on
08/08/2005 4:31:13 PM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
( Heaven on Earth is where the nearest Starbucks is 60 miles away.)
To: upchuck
and in the process, tell the truth Yeah, whatever. I guess if the "truth" is both flexible and relative that case could be made - but it isn't, dear.
To: The Phantom FReeper
They have found a new voice for their agenda. 9/11 widow beware!
11
posted on
08/08/2005 4:33:21 PM PDT
by
rocksblues
(I support the war on terror)
To: upchuck
Nothing worse than a mother tap dancing on her son's grave.
12
posted on
08/08/2005 4:33:25 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: upchuck
I want to hear the recruiter's side of the story.
13
posted on
08/08/2005 4:34:07 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: upchuck
Look: It's easy to view this through a "political prism",and to be critical of this woman.
Losing a child is a horrible experience - as many of you already know - and surviving parents often go through emotional storms that stretch the boundaries of reason.
The people who reached out to Ms Sheehan did so coldly and deliberately: manipulating her hurt and grief to their own ends;tearing at her scars and turning them into fresh wounds.
For the sake of all that's holy,let this poor woman grieve-in her own way-for as long as it takes.
14
posted on
08/08/2005 4:34:10 PM PDT
by
genefromjersey
(So much to flame;so little time !)
To: upchuck
I sympathize with this poor woman on the loss of her son. But a couple of things come to mind, one of which may seem cold. The first is that the United States currently has an all-volunteer military; no one held a gun to her son's head and said he must join. The second is that it looks like Cindy is having a mental breakdown and/or she is being paid to do this by "un-named" sources, like the DNC.
15
posted on
08/08/2005 4:34:20 PM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: 45Auto
Did she respond to the "The President Did Not Kill Your Son" essay yet, written by someone in the military?
16
posted on
08/08/2005 4:35:15 PM PDT
by
summer
To: Sonny M
She hasn't lost her mind. It's a common syndrome among liberal mothers. Do not deal with the grief -- "make the personal political!" (feminist mantra of the left). It's been going on for over 30 years. It's nothing new, at all.
17
posted on
08/08/2005 4:35:41 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: upchuck
The Sarah Brady of the war. There is so much more to say, but I won't.
To: genefromjersey
The problem is, she's not grieving. She's in denial. And using the "politics of meaning" to keep her grief afloat. She can't heal or move to the next stages of grief and healing as long as she keeps on doing this type of behavior (her son voluntarily enlisting, his brave sacrifice -- she obviously doesn't accept these facts).
Therefore in sum, and ergo, she can't "move on". And the cycle of pain continues in her head. She hasn't let her son "rest in peace". She's made his death "personal". She's emotionally stuck there. When for most parents, it's initially "personal", but with solid and substantive grieving that pinch moves on, giving way to the standard steps of healing and recovery.
19
posted on
08/08/2005 4:41:35 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: Alia
She hasn't lost her mind. It's a common syndrome among liberal mothers. Do not deal with the grief -- "make the personal political!" (feminist mantra of the left). It's been going on for over 30 years. It's nothing new, at all.Check the drudge story out.
She has done a total 180 spin from when she met Bush.
That said, is the saying actually "make the personal political"?, One of my old lefty college profs use to say the opposite with "Make political personal!!!".
20
posted on
08/08/2005 4:42:39 PM PDT
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson