Posted on 08/08/2005 11:43:27 AM PDT by QQQQQ
Having Bolton there certainly helps, but don't forget that almost all the countries IN the UN are more anti-US, than they are anti-terrorist, or anti-Iran.
They would rather see the destruction of the US, than anything else.
Well, it could happen, if we had the balls to excersize that option.
I agree that we should never have joined the UN in the first place, and should have gotten out long ago.
But given where we are today, we can use this, as the "last straw" to get us out of the UN once and for all.
How will the UN respond?
A.By doing nothing
B.By bitching about the U.S.
C.By passing resolution 1,977,854 blaming Israel
D.All of the above
Bolton takes over at diplomacy's lowest ebb.
Things just ain't like they used to be.
I believe that Iran is putting their nuke facilities underground, directly below apartments, hospitals, etc. to foil this sort of attack.
You forgot:
E.By asking for more money.
*THEN* it would be all of the above!
Well, I hate they are willing to use their own people as human shields, but, they would have to be prepared to meet God, if I had my way.
"Hey this is serious guys...we better issue another condemnation or maybe even have a committee meeting to discuss the possibility or the likelyhood that we will consider some more series of condemnations this time" The world is watching us this time.
Nuke talks with mollahs will take the world to NO WHERE!
Yeah, those proclamtions work every time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.