To: goldstategop
So what would you suggest?
2 posted on
08/07/2005 10:23:45 PM PDT by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: claudiustg
Like Ann Coulter wrote, it would have been better to have a candidate with proven conservative bonafides. At least the fight would have been worth it. We don't know anything about Roberts and have no idea how he'll vote when he gets on the court. Let's pray Farah and the skeptics like Ann are wrong about him.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".) 3 posted on
08/07/2005 10:26:54 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: claudiustg
I think that all that we have worked for is at risk with this nomination. I think that Farah is correct. If he is correct, then what a bitter blow. However, I can't believe that Bush could or would be so "off the mark". Why or how could he be?
To: claudiustg
If Roberts is not a conservative Justice, Pres. Bush is a failure.
He better be.
11 posted on
08/07/2005 10:31:59 PM PDT by
tomahawk
(Proud to be an enemy of Islam (check out www.prophetofdoom.net))
To: claudiustg
So what would you suggest? More in-depth investigation, followed by overwhelming pressure to dump the nomination and start over if he starts to smell like Souter.
It's not that hard, really. It's called having clear principles and sticking to them.
But these are Republicans, so that is not to be expected.
192 posted on
08/08/2005 1:13:06 AM PDT by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson