Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
It denied them all legal means to seek any protections under the law.

They had every single "protection under the law" that any other citizen of that state had. What they could not do is claim that their homohood earned them any extra protection.

127 posted on 08/08/2005 12:04:55 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
What they could not do is claim that their homohood earned them any extra protection.

Where exactly did I say any different?

And the people of the state played right into their hands by voting in a law specifically classifying "them" as a group, or am I wrong about that, too?

148 posted on 08/08/2005 12:32:00 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson