[jackbill]

To summarize Popper’s two principles, no theory can be absolutely proven, regardless of the number of positive results, but any theory can be disproven by a single negative observation.

Have you seen any Darwinist or evolutionist provide a single negative observation of the inference of "design" of the bacterial flagellum? Or how about the Cambrian Explosion? How about the "blood clotting cascade"?

Take a look at:

http://spectator.org/util/print.asp?art_id=8543

[VadeRetro]

Have you seen any Darwinist or evolutionist provide a single negative observation of the inference of "design" of the bacterial flagellum?

Yes.

Or how about the Cambrian Explosion?

How about "deep roots and tiny prototypes?"

How about the "blood clotting cascade"?

How about it?