Then why not propose an alternate theory that takes all the evidence into account?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Intelligent design by an intelligent creator is an alternate theory that fills all of the gaps that evolutionism (the religion of evolution) will NEVER be able to fill.
Intelligent design answers the creation of the universe, not that it just "appeared" as something from nothing (an impossibility no matter how "cute" the Big Bang might sound). That life is ordered and designed answers the silly notion that evolutionists have that life spontaneously erupted from rocks, water and a few chemicals. Intelligent design answers the complexity of the DNA. Intelligent design answers the MYRIAD of species rather than one "super species" that natural selection SHOULD have turned everything into. Intelligent design answers the mathematical precision of the earth's orbit, and even the earth's moon size and orbit which creates ocean tides "cleansing" the ocean so it doesn't become a putrid, stale, stinking stagnant dead body of water. The input from intelligent design answers how we get order from disorder when the LAWS OF NATURE say the opposite. And on and on...
Seems to me the real issue here is that the blind religious fundamentalist evolutionists feel threatened by the TRUTH that evolution is a science FRAUD!
ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com
The problem is that "intelligent design" is not a scientific theory. It explains everything and therefore nothing. Was there a dinosaur with characteristics a, b, and c? The intelligent designer did it. Did that dinosaur not exist? No problem, the intelligent designer didn't do it. Does my body have unintelligible compromises and incredibly bad design? The intelligent designer obviously knows more than I do, so who am I to question his work? Is there an invisible pink unicorn in my back yard? Sure! Why not? The intelligent designer put it there. And so on.
Most unimpressive.
Intelligent design answers the creation of the universe, not that it just "appeared" as something from nothing (an impossibility no matter how "cute" the Big Bang might sound).
What does "intelligent design" not explain?
That life is ordered and designed answers the silly notion that evolutionists have that life spontaneously erupted from rocks, water and a few chemicals.
Nice straw man. ID also better explains why asparagus tastes more like prunes when you stew it than turnips. I'm impressed.
Intelligent design answers the complexity of the DNA.
Intelligent design answers everything, no matter what!
Intelligent design answers the MYRIAD of species rather than one "super species" that natural selection SHOULD have turned everything into.,p> Ditto. (Not that natural selection predicts that. If you want to criticize a scientific theory, shouldn't you, um, try and find out just a little of what it actually proposes?)
Intelligent design answers the mathematical precision of the earth's orbit, and even the earth's moon size and orbit which creates ocean tides "cleansing" the ocean so it doesn't become a putrid, stale, stinking stagnant dead body of water.
ID's mathematics is based on the unknowable, extrapolated ad lib using an unknown number of unknown variables, and can give any results desired. I'll admit that's pretty convenient, but it's not science.
The input from intelligent design answers how we get order from disorder when the LAWS OF NATURE say the opposite.
Um, this isn't the "second law of thermodynamics" canard, is it?
And on and on...
And on, and on, world without end, amen.
Seems to me the real issue here is that the blind religious fundamentalist evolutionists feel threatened by the TRUTH that evolution is a science FRAUD!
I'm sure it does seem that way to you. You have demonstrated with remarkable precision your complete misunderstanding of the theory evolution, the nature of science, and how logic works.
But you're on a roll, so don't let that stop you.