Natural processes are by definition unintelligent.
You see, your vehement evolutionary militancy marches on: Because I believe in intellegence, I am somehow anti-scientific. Oh my!
No, it's because you assume the undemonstrated and unquantifiable and think that can be part of science, that's why you're anti-scientific.
So someone who wants science to be able to discriminate between intelligence and the lack thereof is unscientific. 1984.
You're missing the point. 5,000BC.
Vis-a-vis intelligence, I am afraid you have made it known in which camp you reside.
I'm happy to go with science.
When it comes to evolutionism, I do not make assumptions. Your inability to quantify and recognize intelligence does not make me unscientific.
It is my love for intelligence and science that makes me want to strip evolutionism from the scientific mainstream.