Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: forgivenyeah
You see, evolutionism definitionally confines itself to unintelligent process. If there were a Creator (who may have endowed people with certain rights, etc...) the evolutionists are unable to recognize Him by definition. Evolutionists are unable to recognize intelligence. Very indescriminate beings, these evolutionists. There are words for people who are unable to recognize intelligence.

There are also words for people who don't know what they're talking about. "Evolutionism" (your term), confines itself to natural processes, not unintelligent processes, which makes it exactly like all of science. If you don't care for science, fine, but at least try to get your facts straight.

183 posted on 08/07/2005 2:30:28 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs

Natural processes are by definition unintelligent.

You see, your vehement evolutionary militancy marches on: Because I believe in intellegence, I am somehow anti-scientific. Oh my!

So someone who wants science to be able to discriminate between intelligence and the lack thereof is unscientific. 1984.

Vis-a-vis intelligence, I am afraid you have made it known in which camp you reside.


189 posted on 08/07/2005 2:40:16 PM PDT by forgivenyeah (Evolutionism is a cancer to knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson