[TomB]

The more complex, the more proof of a designer.

Once again you make a hand-waving statement and expect us to take that as some sort of scientific evidence. You may feel or believe that complexity indicated a designer, but that does not prove anything. You are arguing philosophy, not science.

[LifeOrGoods?]

How would you say that design is not scientific? All animals must eat to live--a scientific fact. How is chance(evolution) able to produce such a perfect order? The probability lies with design over chance. Scientific evidence demonstrates time after time that when design is known, a designer is assumed.