Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Domestic Church

That is a jaw dropping fast demise from this world. Wouldn't viral as opposed to bacterial means it does not respond to antibiotics as bacterial infections as a rule do?


123 posted on 08/07/2005 4:34:00 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: MamaDearest; judithann

Yep, viruses do not respond to antibiotics. If they did, there would be a cure for the common cold..........and AIDS.

Have you kept up with JudithAnns thread? Really interesting and full of some really scary info.


126 posted on 08/07/2005 4:57:33 PM PDT by Rushmore Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

Yes, antibiotics are used primarily for bacterial infections.

There was a dialogue with one Dr. Wang on Nima's website in which he spoke of flu recombinants bubonic plague, ebola and some mystery germ (I suspect a fungus from a blatant error Dt. Wang made - so blatant it had to be a pointer) being pulled from some of these dead pig related cases. I wonder if they were testing variations of bioterror cocktails before selling them.


128 posted on 08/07/2005 5:03:53 PM PDT by Domestic Church (AMDG...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson