To: nmh; cake_crumb
Actually cake is right. Spit has antiseptic substances. If adequate antiseptics aren´t available, use your spit on smaller wounds. However, it is unbelievable that this teacher licked the wounds of students. You can lick your own wounds (because you can´t infect yourself by using your own spit), maybe a Mom can do so with a small scratch of her little child, but a teacher? NEVER!
To: Michael81Dus
"Actually cake is right. Spit has antiseptic substances. If adequate antiseptics aren´t available, use your spit on smaller wounds. However, it is unbelievable that this teacher licked the wounds of students. You can lick your own wounds (because you can´t infect yourself by using your own spit), maybe a Mom can do so with a small scratch of her little child, but a teacher? NEVER!"
Yeah ... right! Totally SICK with NO benefits. Get real!
A dog has antiseptic qualities in their saliva but HUMANS do NOT.
Need I mention that AIDS or hepatitis as one of many consequences of engaging in LICKING and by default EATING blood?
YUCK!
42 posted on
08/08/2005 7:10:26 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson