Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh; cake_crumb

Actually cake is right. Spit has antiseptic substances. If adequate antiseptics aren´t available, use your spit on smaller wounds. However, it is unbelievable that this teacher licked the wounds of students. You can lick your own wounds (because you can´t infect yourself by using your own spit), maybe a Mom can do so with a small scratch of her little child, but a teacher? NEVER!


40 posted on 08/08/2005 5:39:24 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Michael81Dus
"Actually cake is right. Spit has antiseptic substances. If adequate antiseptics aren´t available, use your spit on smaller wounds. However, it is unbelievable that this teacher licked the wounds of students. You can lick your own wounds (because you can´t infect yourself by using your own spit), maybe a Mom can do so with a small scratch of her little child, but a teacher? NEVER!"

Yeah ... right! Totally SICK with NO benefits. Get real!

A dog has antiseptic qualities in their saliva but HUMANS do NOT.

Need I mention that AIDS or hepatitis as one of many consequences of engaging in LICKING and by default EATING blood?

YUCK!
42 posted on 08/08/2005 7:10:26 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson