Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PGalt

It is ironic that this happened, as Carter was directly responsible for the Ayatollah Khomeini’s takeover of Iran. Carter had decided that Mohammed Reza Palavi, the Shah of Iran and a committed friend of the United States, wasn’t democratic enough for Carter’s taste. As a result, Carter insisted the Shah democratize his regime, the result of which was the takeover of Iran by the Ayatollah when the Shah left Iran for cancer treatment in the U.S.

More ironically still, the takeover of Iran by the Islamic fundamentalists emboldened Saddam Hussein, who had just begun his tenure as absolute dictator of Iraq. Believing that the departure of the Shah and the chilling of American/Iranian relations would render Iran ripe for an invasion, Saddam attacked Iran in hopes of securing that country’s oil fields and deposing the Shia Muslim theocracy there. The result was that over 1,000,000 men died during that conflict, which remained at a stalemate for years.


19 posted on 08/06/2005 3:51:37 AM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: F14 Pilot
Carter insisted the Shah democratize his regime

The painful sequence I remember, never mentioned by the press, is that Iran bought some new high end jet fighters from the US, many billions of dollars worth paid in full. Carter decided to 1) cancel the sale after the jets were built, and 2) not give Iran any of their money back.

Where in the Bible does it say you can treat people that way and not get what you got coming?

80 posted on 08/06/2005 7:39:33 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson