The NY Times going after Roberts kids is totally indefensible and inexcusable.
But them they aren't called the New York Slimes for nothing. Hopefully continuing vicious tactics like this will loose them more and more readers. Even their book review su#$$.
Roberts may not be a gay activist, but his views on Consitutional Protection for sodomists is hardly a case of "strict interpretation". I don't care what somebody does in the privacy of their home, as long as its consentual, but I don't want some perverts shoving their aberrant behavior in my face, calling it "normal", espousing it in the scholl systems, and demanding state recognition for it - all of which follows as a result of Roberts' unfortunate pro bono actions.
You Zulu have been on FR for almost 5 years.
One would think you could discern the difference between the liberal medias true thoughts(NYT going after Robert's kids) and their attempts to divide and conquer(ala the LA Times article).
YOU HAVEN'T THE FOGGIEST CLUE WHAT HIS VIEWS ON THAT TOPIC ARE! And yes, I'm yelling.
It's posts like yours referenced above that expose you of posting with an agenda. No serious person is going to claim to glean Roberts' view on "Consitutional Protection for sodomists" from the fact that he spent a few hours coaching another attorney on arguing a case before the SC.