You want to nitpick on how many hours he spent on the case?
It doesn't matter. It was voluntary work. He didn't have to do it, but he did.
Some of us would like to know why. And we'd like to know if he agrees with the SCOTUS's ruling, especially since he helped bring it about.
Thompson is up on Rush. I have no more use for you but will answer one last question, and from that point you are on your own because I refuse to help you in the anti-Roberts agenda.
The number of time spent IS critical. Evidently you seek to dismiss because compared to his hours on cases he was heavily involved in, it undercuts you case. Further if you had done the reserch you claim, you'd note that as lead litigator in firm it is usual for them to contribute time when asked especially on SC cases. You'd know who the source of this story was, which would raise concerns for any thoughtful person.
And, lastly, to attempt to portray the vast majority that support Roberts as people that are against strong questioning is duplicitous.