Have any of you actually read Scalia's dissent?
Or at the very least looked into the history behind this case?
So? Did Scalia single out Roberts(he didn't).
Have you looked into what Roberts involvement actually was and length spent as the top litigator in the firm vs his other pro bono cases?
Roberts didn't bring this to the Surpreme Court, Scalia's dissent was on the merits of the Constitutionality not on Roberts giving 10 hours as opposed to a 100 on another case.