Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
Form the beginning, I said consider the original source of this story: THE L.A. TIMES. You know darn well they stretched what little facts they had to the breaking point to spin this as hard as they could to get this reaction from the right.

That said, I am not troubled by this for a number of reasons. Roberts worked for a large law firm. Roberts was an appellate specialist. His colleagues were working on an appeal. They consulted Roberts. He agreed. What was he supposed to say? "No way Jose, I'm not going to help a bunch of homos?" Arguing and briefing before SCOTUS is a big deal and that Roberts would help a partner prepare is SOP, regardless of the issue. This story is agitprop. As such, I'm with hearing what Roberts has to say, if anything. That the NY Times is going after his adoption papers and the left is dumping huge resources to keep him off the bench is my greatest comfort. That and knowing W and his faith and belief system...

10 posted on 08/05/2005 9:42:44 AM PDT by eureka! (Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/2 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eureka!

Good points.


19 posted on 08/05/2005 9:54:02 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson