[HawaiianGecko]

 

 

	I'm looking for a SC Judge that will interpret the law correctly without any prejudices. If "correctly interpreting" a law happens to help gays, so be it. I damn sure don't want him to misapply and abuse the law simply to promote a concept that I or anyone else might hold. I keep reading posts from many that seem to want to replace left wing judicial activists with right wing judicial activists.

!

 

I'm looking for a SC Judge that will interpret the law correctly without any prejudices. If "correctly interpreting" a law happens to help gays, so be it. I damn sure don't want him to misapply and abuse the law simply to promote a concept that I or anyone else might hold. I keep reading posts from many that seem to want to replace left wing judicial activists with right wing judicial activists.

[republicofdavis]

"I'm looking for a SC Judge that will interpret the law correctly without any prejudices. If "correctly interpreting" a law happens to help gays, so be it. I damn sure don't want him to misapply and abuse the law simply to promote a concept that I or anyone else might hold. I keep reading posts from many that seem to want to replace left wing judicial activists with right wing judicial activists."

Bump

[Sloth]

If "correctly interpreting" a law happens to help gays, so be it... I keep reading posts from many that seem to want to replace left wing judicial activists with right wing judicial activists.

I'll be charitable and assume you are ignorant of the Colorado law in question. This was no case of "correct interpretation."