Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
The fact is that no one will know how any nominee will vote until he's on the bench for about a year. All we can do is do our best, and hope that it suffices.

There are no sure things, but there are better bets than Roberts. He could have nominated someone like Luttig, Garza or Alito, who has a long and uncontroverted record on the bench and has never waivered from their conservative judicial philosophy. Instead, we get a game of Russian roulette.

115 posted on 08/05/2005 9:25:48 AM PDT by Texas Federalist (No matter what my work/play ratio is, I am never a dull boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Federalist

I guaranty you that if you fly-specked the records of the people you named, you'd find stuff like this.

If it makes you feel any better, Roberts and Luttig are very close friends. But looking for the "signs" really does not guaranty a conservative pick. You look for the signs, but there is a certain amount of luck in it. Roberts has very conservative credentials. But that's not enough to ensure a conservative pick. I'm not writing off Roberts yet. About two years into his service, I figure we'll know whether Bush miscalculated.


123 posted on 08/05/2005 9:50:34 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson