Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elbucko
You know, lady, in all my training, I was never encouraged, nay, but always discouraged to the point that it was almost my duty to sacrifice myself for the good of the civilians around me and now you have the nerve to imply that this is not done as a matter of course in the US military.

I have never implied that. NEVER. I was talking specifically about atom bombs, not the general policies and practice of the U.S. Military. In fact, I made a point of recognizing that the US troops were making a massive and conscientious effort to protect Iraqi noncombatants, despite the Islamo-thugs' unceasing attempts to hide themselves behind and among civilians.

If you will take up the time to search my previous posts, you will see that I emphasized that


163 posted on 08/06/2005 11:46:43 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Ius in bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
I have never implied that. NEVER.

Oh?

It's the fact that the decision-makers decided to indiscriminately kill civilians as a means to an end.

That statement, posted by you, seems to contradict your objections to being considered a kind of modern day "Tokyo Rose, or is it a "Tokyo Mrs. Don-o"?

1) attacks on civilians are specifically prohibited by the UCMJ,

There wasn't a UCMJ in WWII. Each service had its own laws and regulations. Furthermore, the UCMJ was prompted by the horrors committed by the Sons of Nippon and the German Super Race in the name of the state and color of authority. It was not prompted by the actions of our own troops.

You A-bomb bashers need to get your facts in a row before you start taking pot-shots at history.

165 posted on 08/06/2005 12:19:01 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson