Wow, that is a bad theory. I'm glad that they have the theory of evolution instead, and not that pared-down misunderstanding of the theory that you saw somewhere!
The fact is evolution has never offered any incontrovertible evidence that man descended from ape,
It could NEVER provide incontrovertible evidence, only evidence that seems to fit the theory. Who's to say we couldn;t find something YOU'D consider incontrovertible, but the next day God appears before everyone and says "You guys are mistaken." Science should always allow for the possibility that it is wrong, but you seem to think that science should start to claim their theories are facts (I'm separating science from the individual scientists on purpose .. some may claim theory to be fact, but they are wong).
but yet you seem to believe it as settled science.
Then you are completely misunderstanding everything I have written. I in no way believe that the current theory of evolution is the exact answer to how life meandering its way through time on this planet.
But it's the best theory we currently have, and in order to be able to reach a more accurate theory, you need to start somewhere ...
When I was in school, I thought protons and electrons were as small as things got. Guess, what, there's smaller stuff! Should protons and electrons not have been considered the smallest things we knew of? If we didn;t, how could we have discovered something smaller?
You might want to take a big smell of that crap you are shoveling.
I'm very far away from you, due to the wonders of the internet, so if you're smelling a load of crap, I'll theorize it's coming from closer to you. You might want to start reading what I actually write instead of what you would need me to write to make arguments you have ready ...