Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim_Curtis
If Darwin's theory was ironclad science, they would encourage having unreasonable theories considered alongside it because this would only help show the truth in Darwinism

So because they don't teach, say, the ancient Greek view of mechanics alongside F=ma, physicists don't really believe Newton's laws of motion?

They would have no problem discussing "flat earth" theory, for instance, because they can make an ironclad case that the earth is a sphere while at the same time show those who believe otherwise are crackpots.

Yeah, that's how we teach science - by bringing up ridiculous theories and then demonstrating they're ridiculous. What a productive use of teaching time!

149 posted on 08/04/2005 3:03:04 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor
Yeah, that's how we teach science - by bringing up ridiculous theories and then demonstrating they're ridiculous. What a productive use of teaching time!

It was in school, geography class probably, that I learned that there used to be a theory that the earth was flat. It was in school, science class probably while learning about the elements that the teacher felt the need to tell us about the theory one of those Greeks had, maybe it was Aristotle, about everything being made of fire,water,etc.

Were my teachers just wasting time?

155 posted on 08/04/2005 3:18:50 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson