Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

No, he's telling you that there's no real scientific contention about evolution. Are you deliberately being so thick?


83 posted on 08/04/2005 11:14:17 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
... there's no real scientific contention about evolution.

That's certainly true:
Statements from Scientific and Scholarly Organizations. Sixty statements, all supporting evolution.
Letter from Bruce Alberts on March 4, 2005. President of the National Academy of Sciences.
Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution. Excellent statement.
Project Steve. Nat'l Center for Science Education: the overwhelming number of genuine scientists supporting evolution.
The National Association of Biology Teachers' Statement on Teaching Evolution. Over 9,000 members.

92 posted on 08/04/2005 11:18:53 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio
You have no sense of humor I can see.

The evidence was there all the time, of course!

Try reading the post to which I was referring. It's part of a stream of consciousness type analysis that I thought needed to be brought to a halt.

BTW, most historians would agree that few scientists have the flexibility of thinking necessary to begin to understand history.

93 posted on 08/04/2005 11:19:47 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson