Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator

So let me get this straight...it has been admittedly thinning for "millenia", yet the New Zealand Herald with it's thousands of years of observing history has determined that it was an almost immeasurable temperature change in the last 50 years that caused this ice shelf to collapse? How arrogant and short-sighted can you get? Just because we haven't SEEN something happen in the perhaps 30 years that we would have been able to observe such an event, how can one presume to chalk it up as a cataclysmic event in the history of the planet? The leap (or lack) of rational thinking there is just stunning...

Next it'll be Karl Rove's fault that we can't walk from Alaska to Russia anymore...


19 posted on 08/04/2005 10:40:19 AM PDT by FinallyBackInNH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FinallyBackInNH
See reply 38. Also, read the whole article. Plus, it's the scientists who wrote the Nature paper who ultimately blamed the collapse on the warming trend occurring since the 1970s, not the New Zealand Herald journalists.
42 posted on 08/04/2005 10:50:53 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson