Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: anymouse
Instead, NASA made the change as part of an ongoing bid to meet U.S. and international environmental bans dating to the 1990s.

Completely and utterly insane.

3 posted on 08/04/2005 9:24:05 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PBRSTREETGANG

Instead, NASA made the change as part of an ongoing bid to meet U.S. and international environmental bans dating to the 1990s.
-----
Agreed that this was political insanity. The impact of such panderinging to the enviro-whacko movement was obvious -- it cost lives. The foam issue most likely would not have happened if the recipe had not been changed. At least to the extent we saw in the first missions which went very well.

This does not say that the foam does not age, with usage but the change was still a massive technical error and any change by NASA should have been completely qualified before it was flown.


9 posted on 08/04/2005 9:47:20 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson